Further Meditations
The time has come dear reader, for me to once again tread delicately along the razor’s edge that separates madness from stupidity. Dedicated Cavernites will recall that when I last swam these troubled waters I got a cramp and ended up floundering around in panicked circles, leaving in my frothing wake a hail of words that, for all their ferocity and velocity, amounted to naught but so much hot air. Despite that last thrashing effort, I remain troubled in the face of these thoughts. I fear that their impenetrable murkiness will lead me into strange currents whose destination I cannot predict. Still, I will know no peace until I release these malformed hypotheses into the gasping vacuum of the intertubes. So loyal reader, gather your courage and gird any loin yet ungirded, for we charge once more into the breach.
Those of you plugged into the zeitgeist will know that much has been made recently of conflict between science and religion. Zealots on both sides of the argument accuse the other of being the agents of intolerance or godless nihilist respectively. Many books have been sold and much airtime filled with glorious nonsense from both sides. The argument is, as far as I know, the most pointless non-sports argument to ever be undertaken by sober and otherwise sane people. It is pointless because neither side can convince the other and more so because neither side has a fully satisfying argument. The argument of a strident creationist is that they believe it because they think it to be true. Fine as far as it goes, but not that useful for a non-believer. The atheist argument is simply that we can understand how some of the systems of the universe work, the world was not created in six days; therefore there is no god. It’s a non sequitur that does little to cover the fact that science can only answer hows, not whys. Tangled in this Gordian Knot are those who attempt to bridge the gap between the scientific fact and religious fervor with crackpot theories that neither serve science nor adhere to any creed and consequently appeal only to those with no understanding of either. I am a card-carrying crackpot.
The first step in finding the reason for our existence lies in understanding that which drives the universe. For lack of a more satisfying term we can call this most essential of motivators the divine. To understand the divine we should look to its manifestations. Start first with those most basic rules, the laws of conservation, there is not a thing that can become nothing, and no nothing that can become a thing. Gaze upon the cosmos and see the clockwork of gravity spinning everything in total order and balance. Any set of circumstances left alone will find a balance. Simply put, the divine, with apologies to pagans everywhere, is perfection. It is not until we come to the interactions of life that we find disorder. We are the root of that disorder, for we possess the intelligence to alter the system, pushing the fulcrum point to where ever is most favorable given the conditions. Balance can’t be achieved under these circumstances. Intellect is chaos; it grinds in the gears of perfection. The divine is perfect; therefore it does not think.
March 11, 2008 at 6:42 PM
Go on. It was starting to get interesting.
March 11, 2008 at 7:06 PM
Thanks. I'll be returning to this theme in the near future.
March 12, 2008 at 11:10 PM
Yes, but was does Van Damme think of this?
March 13, 2008 at 8:28 AM
"Everybody understands a slap in the face. In Japan, Belgium, or America, a punch is a punch."
- actor, philosopher, and human being JCVD
March 13, 2008 at 2:35 PM
"Intellect is chaos. It grinds in the gear of perfection" What does that mean? do you mean that intellect is chaos or that intellect creates chaos. do you mean that it does the grinding or that it is ground. is the gear of perfection, perfection's own gear, a gear that belongs to perfection? What's the picture i am supposed to be seeing, i am trying to put intellect, the grinding and the gear into my virtual coloring book so I can color in the lines and I don't know where to put the stuff.
March 13, 2008 at 6:02 PM
When I say "gears of perfection" I simply mean any self regulating system. Everything in the universe is acting within the rules of a system. each of these systems are in turn part of a greater system which produces as it consumes, a sort of all encompassing perpetual motion machine. A stable system works in the absence of intelligence because no part of the system is capable of changing it's behavior. When a part of the system starts behaving with intelligence it consumes more than it produces, thereby warping the system. The easiest example might be global warming. By acting with intelligence we generated far more carbon dioxide than can be absorbed. At the same time we reduce the earths ability to take in carbon dioxide by clearing forests. Thus the system is pushed out of balance. We can also look to markets for examples. The rules of a market are used in unanticipated ways until a crisis arrives, such as the sub prime meltdown. Any system guided by intelligence or that contains intelligent cogs is vulnerable to this sort of unpredictable critical imbalance. Thus, intelligence is the agent of change or entropy which is why I referred to it as "chaos."
March 14, 2008 at 7:31 AM
I think I caught your chaos and am now thinking which might be the birth of intellect.Intellect looking over itself becoming self aware of being chaos now choses order. Can intellect/ chaos aspire to order or as some would call it grace?
March 14, 2008 at 10:03 AM
Intellect is a trait which gives one the ability to affect ones surroundings. The divine can’t intervene; it is completely contrary to the nature of the divine to step outside the rules, to act with intellect toward a situation. The divine defines itself by maintaining the rules perfectly, without exception. To do otherwise would cause chaos through unintended consequences. Following this reasoning a "state of grace" could be achieved, one could choose to live in balance with the rest of the world, but it would be exceedingly difficult for a thinking being, and utterly natural to a goldfish.
This isn’t to say that I’m against intellect, or that I’m a luddite. On a planetary scale I think that, we as humans, are capable of recovering from most of our missteps. It’s simply an observation; that the universe never enters into an imbalance, so to what end would the divine posses intellect?
On the other hand we could take the argument that as everything functions within the divine system, the evolution of intelligence is a necessary and inevitable part of the divine. Thus we are the intellect of the divine and that grace can only be achieved by a being that can choose order over chaos.